aislop — AI Code Quality Gate vs cfn-lint-action
Side-by-side comparison of scanaislop/aislop and ScottBrenner/cfn-lint-action: composite score, security signals, maintenance and popularity — refreshed daily.
| Metric | aislop — AI Code Quality Gatescanaislop/aislop | cfn-lint-actionScottBrenner/cfn-lint-action |
|---|---|---|
| ActionRank score | B81 / 100 | B79 / 100 |
| Maintenance (30%) | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
| Popularity (20%) | 47 / 100 | 39 / 100 |
| Security (35%) | 75 / 100 | 76 / 100 |
| Reliability (15%) | 100 / 100 | 96 / 100 |
| Maintenance status | Actively maintained | Actively maintained |
| Stars | ★ 529 | ★ 77 |
| Last commit | 9 days ago | 5 days ago |
| Latest version | v1 | v2.7.1 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | No data | 7.6 / 10 |
| Known advisories | None on record | None on record |
| SECURITY.md | Yes | Yes |
| Immutable releases | Not enabled | Not enabled |
| Archived | No | No |
Verdict
aislop — AI Code Quality Gate comes out ahead: 81/100 (grade B) versus 79/100 (grade B) for cfn-lint-action — a 2-point gap on the ActionRank scale.
Metrics from the GitHub API, security score from OpenSSF Scorecard, advisories from OSV.dev. aislop — AI Code Quality Gate last updated Aug 2, 2026; cfn-lint-action last updated Aug 2, 2026. See our methodology.