Pipelock Agent Security Scan vs Fence
Side-by-side comparison of luckyPipewrench/pipelock and openai/fence: composite score, security signals, maintenance and popularity — refreshed daily.
| Metric | Pipelock Agent Security ScanluckyPipewrench/pipelock | Fenceopenai/fence |
|---|---|---|
| ActionRank score | B82 / 100 | B83 / 100 |
| Maintenance (30%) | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
| Popularity (20%) | 53 / 100 | 36 / 100 |
| Security (35%) | 88 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
| Reliability (15%) | 70 / 100 | 70 / 100 |
| Maintenance status | Actively maintained | Actively maintained |
| Stars | ★ 965 | ★ 164 |
| Last commit | yesterday | 4 days ago |
| Latest version | v3.7.1 | v0.12.3 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 9.7 / 10 | No data |
| Known advisories | None on record | None on record |
| SECURITY.md | Yes | Yes |
| Immutable releases | Not enabled | Enabled |
| Archived | No | No |
Verdict
Fence comes out ahead: 83/100 (grade B) versus 82/100 (grade B) for Pipelock Agent Security Scan — a 1-point gap on the ActionRank scale.
Metrics from the GitHub API, security score from OpenSSF Scorecard, advisories from OSV.dev. Pipelock Agent Security Scan last updated Oct 27, 2026; Fence last updated Oct 26, 2026. See our methodology.