Shai-Hulud 2.0 Detector vs Fence
Side-by-side comparison of gensecaihq/Shai-Hulud-2.0-Detector and openai/fence: composite score, security signals, maintenance and popularity — refreshed daily.
| Metric | Shai-Hulud 2.0 Detectorgensecaihq/Shai-Hulud-2.0-Detector | Fenceopenai/fence |
|---|---|---|
| ActionRank score | B81 / 100 | B83 / 100 |
| Maintenance (30%) | 95 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
| Popularity (20%) | 42 / 100 | 35 / 100 |
| Security (35%) | 100 / 100 | 100 / 100 |
| Reliability (15%) | 58 / 100 | 70 / 100 |
| Maintenance status | Actively maintained | Actively maintained |
| Stars | ★ 150 | ★ 151 |
| Last commit | 1 months ago | 12 days ago |
| Latest version | v2.2.0 | v0.10.1 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | No data | No data |
| Known advisories | None on record | None on record |
| SECURITY.md | Yes | Yes |
| Immutable releases | Enabled | Enabled |
| Archived | No | No |
Verdict
Fence comes out ahead: 83/100 (grade B) versus 81/100 (grade B) for Shai-Hulud 2.0 Detector — a 2-point gap on the ActionRank scale.
Metrics from the GitHub API, security score from OpenSSF Scorecard, advisories from OSV.dev. Shai-Hulud 2.0 Detector last updated Sep 14, 2026; Fence last updated Sep 14, 2026. See our methodology.